By Stefano Predelli
Stefano Predelli involves the safeguard of the normal "formal" method of natural-language semantics, arguing that it's been misrepresented not just through its critics, but in addition by way of its most effective defenders. In Contexts he bargains a primary reappraisal, with specific consciousness to the remedy of indexicality and different kinds of contextual dependence that have been the focal point of a lot contemporary controversy. within the method, he offers unique techniques to a couple of very important semantic concerns, together with the connection among validity and indexicality, the boundaries of token-reflexive platforms, the importance of contextualist arguments, and the translation of angle studies. Contexts will make invigorating analyzing for all philosophers of language and plenty of linguists.
Read Online or Download Contexts: Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language PDF
Similar semantics books
Stefano Predelli involves the safeguard of the conventional "formal" method of natural-language semantics, arguing that it's been misrepresented not just via its critics, but additionally via its preferable defenders. In Contexts he deals a primary reappraisal, with specific realization to the therapy of indexicality and different kinds of contextual dependence which were the focal point of a lot fresh controversy.
This ebook constitutes the refereed court cases of the sixth Metadata and Semantics learn convention, MTSR 2012, held in Cádiz, Spain, in November 2012. The 33 revised papers offered have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from eighty five submissions. The papers are geared up in a normal, major music and a number of other others: a tune on metadata and semantics for open entry repositories, study details platforms and infrastructures, a moment on metadata and semantics for cultural collections and functions, and eventually one on metadata and semantics for agriculture, meals and surroundings.
This e-book constitutes the refereed complaints of the seventh Metadata and Semantics learn convention, MTSR 2013, held in Thessaloniki, Greece, in November 2013. The 29 revised papers provided have been conscientiously reviewed and chosen from 89 submissions. The papers are geared up in different periods and tracks.
This booklet argues that yes descriptions ('the table', 'the King of France') discuss with members, as Gottlob Frege claimed. This it seems that basic end flies within the face of philosophical orthodoxy, which includes Bertrand Russell's conception that certain descriptions are units of quantification.
- Formal Semantics for VHDL
- The Logic of Metaphor: Analogous Parts of Possible Worlds
- Journal on Data Semantics X
- From Conceptual Metaphor Theory to Cognitive Ethnolinguistics: Patterns of Imagery in Language
- Sadness Expressions in English and Chinese: Corpus Linguistic Contrastive Semantic Analysis
Extra info for Contexts: Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language
Non-demonstrative indexicals, Recanati points out, are relatively unexciting: everybody and his dog know that ‘I’ depends on context. It does so, Recanati adds, in a straightforward manner. In the case of ‘I’, the contextual assignment is automatic and rule-governed. Thus the reference of ‘I’ is determined automatically on the basis of a linguistic rule, without taking the speaker’s beliefs and intentions into consideration. (Recanati 2002a: 299) Allegedly of greater interest are other, presumably more pragmatically oriented instances of indexicality.
They are devices that make it possible for someone to utter a sentence at a time t and location l without actually being in l at t. Given the possibility of remote utterances, so this view continues, it is not implausible to conclude that Jones ‘uttered’ (2) at Wve o’clock, when Mrs Jones read the note, and that you ‘uttered’ (3) in your house, Systems and Indexes $ 49 where your message was decoded by your addressee. If this is correct, then the desired results may be obtained with respect to the co-ordinates sanctioned by the Simple-Minded View, without concocting special characters for the indexicals in question, and, more generally, without deviating from the simple interpretive system of Chapter 1.
In fact, neither of these claims seems to be true. 15 Equally doubtful, in the absence of arguments to the contrary, is that (a) and (b) ‘follow’ from Grice’s more general premisses, or that they are essentially part and parcel of his wider approach. But it is not Grice’s approach to implicatures and ‘what is said’ that is important for my project here, but the signiWcance of the positive conclusion which Sperber, Wilson, and others put forth in this respect: namely, that ‘the disambiguation of utterances, and the assignment of reference to their referring phrases, must fall squarely within the domain of pragmatics’ (Wilson and Sperber 1981: 157–8).