By P. Lasersohn
Plurality, Conjunction and Events provides a singular conception of plural and conjoined words, in an event-based semantic framework. It starts via reviewing concepts for treating the alternation among `collective' and `distributive' readings of sentences containing plural or conjoined noun words, together with analyses from either the fashionable and the premodern literature. it truly is argued that plural and conjoined noun words are unambiguously group-denoting, and that the collective/distributive contrast consequently has to be positioned within the predicates with which those noun words mix. extra in particular, predicates should have a hidden argument position for occasions; the collective/distributive contrast might then be represented within the part/whole constitution of those occasions. this permits a ordinary therapy of `collectivizing' adverbial expressions, and of `pluractional' affixes; it additionally permits a unified semantics for conjunction, within which conjoined sentences and predicates denote teams of occasions, very like conjoined noun words denote teams of people.
Read Online or Download Plurality, Conjunction and Events PDF
Similar semantics books
Stefano Predelli involves the protection of the conventional "formal" method of natural-language semantics, arguing that it's been misrepresented not just via its critics, but additionally via its top-rated defenders. In Contexts he deals a basic reappraisal, with specific realization to the remedy of indexicality and other kinds of contextual dependence which were the focal point of a lot contemporary controversy.
This ebook constitutes the refereed complaints of the sixth Metadata and Semantics examine convention, MTSR 2012, held in Cádiz, Spain, in November 2012. The 33 revised papers awarded have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from eighty five submissions. The papers are equipped in a normal, major song and a number of other others: a tune on metadata and semantics for open entry repositories, learn details platforms and infrastructures, a moment on metadata and semantics for cultural collections and functions, and at last one on metadata and semantics for agriculture, nutrition and setting.
This publication constitutes the refereed lawsuits of the seventh Metadata and Semantics learn convention, MTSR 2013, held in Thessaloniki, Greece, in November 2013. The 29 revised papers awarded have been conscientiously reviewed and chosen from 89 submissions. The papers are prepared in different periods and tracks.
This booklet argues that yes descriptions ('the table', 'the King of France') consult with contributors, as Gottlob Frege claimed. This it seems that uncomplicated end flies within the face of philosophical orthodoxy, which includes Bertrand Russell's concept that sure descriptions are units of quantification.
- Language and Society
- Essays in Logical Semantics
- Adjectives: Formal Analyses in Syntax and Semantics
- The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning And Temporal Cognition (Human Cognitive Processing)
- The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station
- Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions
Additional resources for Plurality, Conjunction and Events
However Sanctius' work triggered a long-Iasting debate over something essentially identical to the S/S Analysis, and therefore seems like a good place to start. 3 Sanctius (Book I, Ch. 18; Book III, Ch. 14) suggested something like the S/S Analysis in order to account for certain peculiarities in case assignment in Latin. 1) Emi equum centum aureis, et pluris. ' The verb emi, 'bought, , normally requires that the phrase indicating the price of the purehase be in the ablative case; a limited class of items, however, may be in the genitive instead.
Adherents of modem syntactic theories may also find the S/S Analysis unattractive. A reciprocal formation role of the sort proposed THE S/S ANALYSIS 51 by Gleitman (and perhaps implicit in Beattie) would seem to make impossible an account of the syntactic distribution of reciprocal pronouns in terms of Binding Theory, for example. Gleitman's nominalization rule is also inconsistent with the lexicalist approach to nominalization popular since Chomsky (1970). An analysis like Schein's does not appear to contradict these standard assumptions, but runs into its own semantic problems, including problems with reciprocals, as we have seen.
NOTES 1. S. , London. 2. But see my remarks on a "Montagovian" interpretation of Aristotle, at the end of this section. 3. Pope John XXI. Peter takes a somewhat different posItIOn in his Tractatus Syncategorematum. g. Rivero 1973, Wierzbicka 1980). I think this is the result of actual inconsistency on Peter's part, and not because his views have been "misappropriated," as Wierzbicka suggests; it may also be that the Syncategoremata was not really written by Peter (Moody 1967). 4. The translation is by F.